Nikon 40mm micro helicon remote1/29/2024 The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance". This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary". The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional". The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics". These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously. Almost every issue of a photo mag I read runs copy on this genre.Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. Let's hope Nikon updates both long Micro-Nikkors, as the market in close up photography of natural subjects has expanded in a big way through the 2000s. The 200 f4 AFD Micro + Z Nikon should make a nice couple. The IBIS and focus-peaking on the Z7 has bought new life to all my older lenses (despite no exif with AIS/no AF with AFD). The AF is outrun by the average mollusc, but usually one focuses manually. But I have reinforced the tripod collar neck with 2 thin stainless steel capscrews + epoxy that affix a permanent arca-swiss plate. But I could never afford either Finally I found a Used 70-180 which is still unique in its framing abilities. I'd always coveted a 200 f4 Micro-Nikkor primarily for venomous snakes, with which a 55 gets a mite too cosy. My core macro lens was/is the 55 f2.8AIS (since 1989) and mine has worked hard in biodiversity surveys and more. The results on D850 and Z7 confirm what the reviews say WRT to its VR and IQ. I also bought a new Sigma 180 f2.8APO - ex display form LCE so a little lighter wallet smack. Had Nikon updated the 200 f/4 I would likely have bought it over the Sigma, but I am very pleased with the Sigma and do not plan trading it in for the Nikkor. Helicon Remote allows you to tether your Canon or Nikon DSLR camera to a computer or a mobile device and automates focus (DoF) bracketing, exposure bracketing (HDR), and time lapse photography. I agee that VR is of limited use with macro, but it is of value with close ups. Your points are well taken and you are correct in that I have not used the Nikon 200 f/4 macro, but have relied on reports from trusted sites and users. One area where AF-S is useful is with focus stacking where small changes in focus can be achieved via software with such programs as Helicon Remote, Camranger or even Nikon Camera Control 2/. I am in no way criticizing the Sigma, which I have not used, and when the 200 micro is updated I shall be very interested, but the 200 micro is already an exemplary lens and it is not clear to me that AFS, VR or nanocoating would actually be real improvements. Finally, the 200mm micro is sharper, I prefer images cropped from the 200 over the 300. The 300mm lens may have VR but in a situation where 100% crops are often needed the VR on the 300mm lens is not particularly effective in the relevant range, and I can hand hold the 200mm at lower shutter speeds than the 300mm VR. The screw drive may be noisy to humans but I think it is less disturbing to my subjects that the AFS motor which is silent to humans. AF may be slower but I think it is more accurate than the modern AFS lens. The Sigma may well be a very good lens, and an update to the 200mm micro may be an improvement when it comes, but I don't think your criticisms are based on experience with the 200mm micro? I have been using it side by side with 300mm F4 AFS VR PF for butterfly photographs and I get more keepers from the 200. See this thread on LuLa for a good discussion: Its main disadvantage is that it is bulky and heavy, but-that is the price one pays for large aperture and robust construction. I recently was in the market for a long macro, and chose the Sigma 180 f/2.8 and am very pleased wigh it. Furthermore, it lacks the latest lens coatings. While AF is not needed for most macro, it can be helpful at lower magnifications when hand holding. AF is via a screw mechanism and s very slow. This is an old lens and needs to be updated. It is a specialized lens for macro work if you are looking for a general purpose 200 mm lens with macro capabilities I don't think this lens would be a great choice-no image stabilization.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |